“Modi Shown 73 Times, Rahul Gandhi 6”: Congress Highlights Bias in President Murmu’s Address Coverage

The Congress party has alleged a glaring bias in the coverage of President Droupadi Murmu’s address to the Parliament, claiming that Prime Minister Narendra Modi was shown 73 times during the televised broadcast, while Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi was shown only 6 times. This disparity, according to the Congress, reflects a deliberate attempt to overshadow the opposition leader and highlight the ruling party’s presence.

This allegation has been met with strong reactions from both sides of the political spectrum. While the Congress has accused the government of manipulating media coverage to its advantage, the BJP has dismissed the allegations as baseless and politically motivated.

Here’s a breakdown of the key points:

• Congress’s Accusations: The Congress party, through its official Twitter handle, stated that the television coverage of the President’s address “unfairly prioritised” PM Modi’s presence, showcasing him 73 times compared to Rahul Gandhi’s 6 appearances. This, according to the Congress, highlights a deliberate attempt to marginalize the opposition leader and promote a narrative favoring the ruling party.

• BJP’s Response: The BJP, however, has refuted the Congress’s accusations, stating that the claims are politically motivated and lack any factual basis. They argue that the camera focus during the President’s address is determined by the television channels and not by the government.

• Public Reactions: The issue has sparked debate on social media, with various viewpoints being expressed. Some users support the Congress’s claims and believe that the coverage reflects a biased approach, while others argue that the accusations are politically driven and ignore the realities of media coverage.

The Significance of the Allegations: This incident raises crucial questions about media impartiality and the political influence on news coverage. The allegations, if proven, could signify a concerning trend of political manipulation in media narratives, impacting the public perception of the political landscape.

What’s Next: It remains to be seen whether the Congress will provide further evidence to substantiate its claims. The debate surrounding media coverage and its potential for political influence is likely to continue, raising important discussions about the role of media in a democracy.

Keywords: President Murmu, PM Modi, Rahul Gandhi, Congress, BJP, Media Coverage, Bias, Television, Parliament Address, Political Influence, Media Impartiality.

Source