NCERT’s “Bharat” Textbook Debate: A Useless Controversy?

The National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) has dismissed calls to replace “India” with “Bharat” in textbooks as a “useless debate.” This decision has sparked controversy, with some arguing that the change would promote national pride while others view it as unnecessary and symbolic.

Keywords: NCERT, Bharat, India, Textbook, Controversy, National Pride, Symbolic, Debate

The Debate:

Proponents of the change argue that using “Bharat” would foster a greater sense of national identity and connect students with the country’s rich historical and cultural heritage. They believe that the use of “Bharat” would instill a stronger sense of patriotism and unity among students.

Opponents, however, argue that the change is unnecessary and divisive. They contend that “India” and “Bharat” are both valid and recognized names for the country and that using one over the other would not fundamentally alter the understanding of national identity.

NCERT’s Position:

The NCERT has maintained that the focus should be on quality education and that such symbolic changes are not a priority. The council believes that the focus should be on improving the curriculum, ensuring inclusivity, and equipping students with the necessary skills for the 21st century.

The Way Forward:

The debate surrounding the use of “Bharat” in textbooks highlights the importance of engaging in constructive discussions about national identity and symbolism. While there are strong arguments on both sides, it is crucial to ensure that any changes to the curriculum are well-considered, evidence-based, and promote the best interests of students and the nation.