“Undemocratic, But Not Unconstitutional”: Shashi Tharoor on Emergency – A Look at the 1975 Crisis

India’s turbulent past holds many dark chapters, one of the most significant being the Emergency of 1975. This period of authoritarian rule, imposed by then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, continues to be a subject of intense debate and analysis. Recently, Congress leader Shashi Tharoor’s statement, “Undemocratic, but not unconstitutional,” reignited discussions on the legitimacy and consequences of this historical event.

What Was the Emergency?

The Emergency, declared by Indira Gandhi on June 25, 1975, was a period of political suppression in India. Following the Allahabad High Court’s ruling that invalidated her election, Gandhi invoked Article 352 of the Indian Constitution, citing “internal disturbance.” This enabled her to suspend civil liberties, detain political opponents, and rule by decree.

Tharoor’s Statement: Context and Controversy

Tharoor’s assertion that the Emergency, while undemocratic, was technically constitutional has sparked controversy. While it is true that the Constitution provided the legal framework for the declaration, critics argue that the abuse of power, suppression of dissent, and blatant disregard for fundamental rights overshadowed any legal justification.

The Dark Side of the Emergency

The Emergency saw widespread arrests, media censorship, and the curtailment of fundamental rights. Opponents of the government, including political leaders, journalists, and activists, were imprisoned without trial. The press was tightly controlled, and freedom of expression was severely curtailed. The Emergency is also remembered for the forced sterilization program, a brutal and inhumane policy that violated basic human rights.

Lessons From the Emergency

The Emergency serves as a stark reminder of the potential for authoritarianism even in a democratic society. It highlights the importance of strong institutions, independent judiciary, and a vigilant citizenry to safeguard democracy.

Shashi Tharoor’s Perspective

While Tharoor’s statement acknowledges the undemocratic nature of the Emergency, it also suggests a complex historical understanding. It highlights the nuanced relationship between legal framework and actual practice, demonstrating how the constitution can be used to justify actions that violate its spirit.

Moving Forward

The Emergency remains a significant historical event, reminding us of the fragility of democracy and the importance of safeguarding civil liberties. As India continues to grapple with its past, it is crucial to engage in informed discussions about the Emergency, its lasting impact, and the lessons it holds for the future of Indian democracy.

Keywords: Emergency, India, Indira Gandhi, Shashi Tharoor, Constitution, Democracy, Human Rights, Authoritarianism, 1975, Political History, Freedom of Expression, Media Censorship, Internal Disturbance, Article 352, Forced Sterilization

Source